Analyzing consensus approaches in fuzzy group decision making: advantages and drawbacks

نویسندگان

  • Francisco Javier Cabrerizo
  • Juan Manuel Moreno
  • Ignacio J. Pérez
  • Enrique Herrera-Viedma
چکیده

Two processes are necessary to solve group decision making problems: a consensus process and a selection process. The consensus process is necessary to obtain a final solution with a certain level of agreement between the experts, while the selection process is necessary to obtain such a final solution. Clearly, it is preferable that the set of experts reach a high degree of consensus before applying the selection process. In order to measure the degree of consensus, different approaches have been proposed. For example, we can use hard consensus measures, which vary between 0 (no consensus or partial consensus) and 1 (full consensus), or soft consensus measures, which assess the consensus degree in a more flexible way. The aim of this paper is to analyze the different consensus approaches in fuzzy group decision making problems and discuss their advantages and drawbacks. Additionally, we study the future trends.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Soft consensus measures in group decision making using unbalanced fuzzy linguistic information

An important question in group decision-making situations is how to estimate the consensus achieved within the group of decisionmakers. Dictionarymeaning of consensus is a general and unanimous agreement among a group of individuals. However, most of the approaches deal with a more realistic situation of partial agreement. Defining a partial agreement of decision makers as a consensus up to som...

متن کامل

On Consensus Measures in Fuzzy Group Decision Making

In group decision making problems, a natural question in the consensus process is how to measure the closeness among experts’ opinions in order to obtain the consensus level. To do so, different approaches have been proposed. For instance, several authors have introduced hard consensus measures varying between 0 (no consensus or partial consensus) and 1 (full consensus or complete agreement). H...

متن کامل

A Consensus Model for Group Decision Making Problems with Unbalanced Fuzzy Linguistic Information

Most group decision making (GDM) problems based on linguistic approaches use symmetrically and uniformly distributed linguistic term sets to express experts’ opinions. However, there exist problems whose assessments need to be represented by means of unbalanced linguistic term sets, i.e. using term sets that are not uniformly and symmetrically distributed. The aim of this paper is to present a ...

متن کامل

Hybrid multi-criteria group decision-making for supplier selection problem with interval-valued Intuitionistic fuzzy data

The main objectives of supply chain management are reducing the risk of supply chain and production cost, increase the income, improve the customer services, optimizing the achievement level, and business processes which would increase ability, competency, customer satisfaction, and profitability. Further, the process of selecting the appropriate supplier capable of providing buyerchr('39')s re...

متن کامل

A symbol-based fuzzy decision-making approach to evaluate the user satisfaction on services in academic digital libraries

Academic libraries play a significant role in providing core services that include research, teaching and learning. Usersatisfaction is an important indicator for evaluating the performance of library service. This paper develops a methodfor measuring the user satisfaction in a group decision-making environment. First, the performance of service isevaluated by using questionnaire survey. The sc...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Soft Comput.

دوره 14  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2010